﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fairfax &amp; Loudoun Personal Injury Lawyer - All Topics - Latest Comments</title>
    <description>Fairfax / Loudon accident attorney Doug Landau of Abrams Landau, Ltd. blogs about personal injury topics including workers compensation claims, third-party negligence cases &amp; social security disability.</description>
    <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/</link>
    <atom:link href="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>A comment on Deadly "trailer sway" - the hidden dangers of RVs</title>
      <description>This is good to know. Thanks for sending this to me.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/tractor-trailer-accidents/deadly-trailer-sway-the-hidden-dangers-of-rvs.aspx?googleid=275264#C33094</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on Deadly "trailer sway" - the hidden dangers of RVs</source>
      <category>Tractor-Trailer Accidents</category>
      <category>Trailer sway deadly</category>
      <category> "Recreational Vehicle"</category>
      <category> "RV" met by crosswind</category>
      <category> RV passing truck</category>
      <category> RV sideways wind source</category>
      <category> RV</category>
      <category> Broadlands and Broad Run injury lawyer Doug Landau</category>
      <category>large vehicle difficult to handle</category>
      <category> windy condition</category>
      <category> trial lawyer Landau</category>
      <category> RV crash</category>
      <category> Recreational vehicle accident</category>
      <dc:creator>Doug Landau</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:52:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on Deadly "trailer sway" - the hidden dangers of RVs</title>
      <description>Trailer sway does not have to occur if the trailer is equipped with the proper equipment.  I have been in the trailer sway eliminating business for over 13 years.  To effectively eliminate trailer sway RVers should look to install a pivot point projection hitch.  Trailer sway from passing trucks, high winds, uneven road surfaces, poor trailer design and even driver inputs into the towed trailer is eliminated.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/tractor-trailer-accidents/deadly-trailer-sway-the-hidden-dangers-of-rvs.aspx?googleid=275264#C33092</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on Deadly "trailer sway" - the hidden dangers of RVs</source>
      <category>Tractor-Trailer Accidents</category>
      <category>Trailer sway deadly</category>
      <category> "Recreational Vehicle"</category>
      <category> "RV" met by crosswind</category>
      <category> RV passing truck</category>
      <category> RV sideways wind source</category>
      <category> RV</category>
      <category> Broadlands and Broad Run injury lawyer Doug Landau</category>
      <category>large vehicle difficult to handle</category>
      <category> windy condition</category>
      <category> trial lawyer Landau</category>
      <category> RV crash</category>
      <category> Recreational vehicle accident</category>
      <dc:creator>Sean Woodruff</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on Illegal, intoxicated and unlicensed drivers - where's the insurance ?</title>
      <description>This is all very good advice,   it is so very important to have good UM and UIM coverage to protect you and your family.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/illegal-intoxicated-and-unlicensed-drivers-wheres-the-insurance-.aspx?googleid=273004#C30656</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on Illegal, intoxicated and unlicensed drivers - where's the insurance ?</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>Car crash</category>
      <category> insurance</category>
      <category> illegal driver</category>
      <category> intoxicated driver</category>
      <category> unlicensed driver</category>
      <category> uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage</category>
      <category> abrams landau</category>
      <category> driver flees</category>
      <category> attorney specializes automobile accidents</category>
      <dc:creator>Mike Bryant</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:23:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on Offer of Judment; "Put up or shut up"</title>
      <description>Minnesota just updated their law a year ago,  it seems to be making a difference,  but many people are still trying to figure it out. The additional incentive,  is the doubling of costs if the plaintiff beats the Rule 68 offer.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/offer-of-judment-put-up-or-shut-up-.aspx?googleid=272332#C30004</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on Offer of Judment; "Put up or shut up"</source>
      <category>Automobile Accidents</category>
      <category>"Offer of Judgment"</category>
      <category> settlement dog attack</category>
      <category> car crash</category>
      <category> truck crash</category>
      <category> defective product</category>
      <category> motor vehicle accident</category>
      <category> "put up of shut up"</category>
      <category> collecting more than policy limits</category>
      <dc:creator>Mike Bryant</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:26:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on The Social Security Denial Saga</title>
      <description>Thank you Kevin for your interest. Of course, if someone comes in and we feel that an appeal won't be successful then we don't encourage it.  Appealing such cases would be frivolous and would be to nobody's benefit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My point is that many people who are eligible are denied and that with our help many of these  decisions are reversed and these people get the SSDI benefits to which they are entitled.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/the-social-security-denial-saga.aspx?googleid=268902#C28070</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on The Social Security Denial Saga</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>social security disability</category>
      <category> ssdi</category>
      <category> ssdi appeal</category>
      <category> denial of social security benefits</category>
      <dc:creator>Melissa Landau</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</title>
      <description>I'm very excited i stumbled upon this site.  My friend was telling me how I shouldn't practice in the area of personal injury because of all the frivolous lawsuits "those attorneys" are known for, citing the McDonald's case.  This of course made me furious because people are completely ignorant of the actual facts of the case, yet love to reference it when they are degrading the profession. It is good news to hear they are making a film to enlighten those too lazy to read about it.  I think it will help to some extent with the negative opinions so many have, though I am not insinuating all plaintiff's attorneys make the best decisions as to what cases to pursue...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And poor Cupholder guy, your patent attorney has you thinking people will sue for just about anything.  I'm sure Canada is different, but it's not as bad as you were lead to believe.  Your patent attorney was trying to protect you in every possible way he could think of, which included "improbable but not impossible".  If it makes you feel any better, in Louisiana if something is obvious or "common sense" as you put it(such as hot liquids spilling out of a cup holder when driving over bumpy terrain) then you normally would not be liable under our Products Liability Act for an inadequate warning. Now if your cup holder didn't work properly as was intended, then that would be a different issue, but not for omitting a warning for what you suggested.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But glad to hear about the movie, I will gladly pass this information along to my colleagues.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/-hot-coffee-spills-the-beans-on-charges-of-frivolous-lawsuits-.aspx?googleid=268636#C27694</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>hot coffee</category>
      <category> mcdonalds lawsuit</category>
      <category> frivolous lawsuits</category>
      <category> documentary</category>
      <category> liebeck</category>
      <category> 3rd degree burns</category>
      <category> fast food</category>
      <category> suing mcdonalds</category>
      <dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on The Social Security Denial Saga</title>
      <description>Some people who file for disability are not eligible. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If your success rate is 99% then you must be screening out people who you think will lose.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/the-social-security-denial-saga.aspx?googleid=268902#C27502</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on The Social Security Denial Saga</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>social security disability</category>
      <category> ssdi</category>
      <category> ssdi appeal</category>
      <category> denial of social security benefits</category>
      <dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:28:39 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</title>
      <description>Hey Cupholder Guy - thanks for taking part in the conversation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes, it would be at least a little silly if someone brewed their OWN coffee at nearly 200 degrees (intentionally, despite having hundreds of reports of burns caused by same on hand), filled up a flimsy styrofoam cup with it, put it in your company's cupholder (which is replete with warnings), and went speeding down speed bump alley, sloshing near boiling fluid all over the place. Any sensible person would expect to run the risk of being burned. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Given those facts, it would be even sillier if the individual above tried to sue you. But silliest would be a lawyer who spent his own money and time to bring that suit against you. You and I would both find that ridiculous, and so would a jury, I imagine. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What we are talking about with Hot Coffee, the documentary, is a company (McDonalds) that did all those foolish things, but handed the coffee off to an elderly woman who, incidentally, was parked in the parking spot when she spilled the 190 degree coffee on herself, resulting in 3rd degree burns so bad that she needed skin grafts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The more I learn of this case, the more comfortable I am with the jury's decisions.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/-hot-coffee-spills-the-beans-on-charges-of-frivolous-lawsuits-.aspx?googleid=268636#C26888</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>hot coffee</category>
      <category> mcdonalds lawsuit</category>
      <category> frivolous lawsuits</category>
      <category> documentary</category>
      <category> liebeck</category>
      <category> 3rd degree burns</category>
      <category> fast food</category>
      <category> suing mcdonalds</category>
      <dc:creator>Darren Wilson</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</title>
      <description>Cupholder Guy: Do what you're doing, keep adding common sense and evaluation; warn of dangers and you'll be okay. But please see the movie and let us know what you think of it.</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/-hot-coffee-spills-the-beans-on-charges-of-frivolous-lawsuits-.aspx?googleid=268636#C26852</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>hot coffee</category>
      <category> mcdonalds lawsuit</category>
      <category> frivolous lawsuits</category>
      <category> documentary</category>
      <category> liebeck</category>
      <category> 3rd degree burns</category>
      <category> fast food</category>
      <category> suing mcdonalds</category>
      <dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:36:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</title>
      <description>Dear guys,  One of the main facts that got the jury angry with McDonalds was their callous disregard of the the health and safety of the public.  They didn't have just 10 or 20 prior scalding incidents, they had over 150 !  Cupholder guy sounds very responsive and responsible.  I am sure that if he had a product that was certain to cause devastating, permanent injury (such as 190 degree scalding hot liquid in a flimsy cup with no reinforcement), he would take reasonable steps to keep more people from being injured for life.  McDonald's did NOT get the message until this jury verdict was handed down.  It is one of the positive effects of placing a case like this in the hands of a jury to decide the case after hearing all of the evidence.  Doug Landau</description>
      <link>http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/-hot-coffee-spills-the-beans-on-charges-of-frivolous-lawsuits-.aspx?googleid=268636#C26842</link>
      <source url="http://fairfax-loudoun.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/">A comment on “Hot Coffee” spills the beans on frivolous lawsuit charges</source>
      <category>Miscellaneous</category>
      <category>hot coffee</category>
      <category> mcdonalds lawsuit</category>
      <category> frivolous lawsuits</category>
      <category> documentary</category>
      <category> liebeck</category>
      <category> 3rd degree burns</category>
      <category> fast food</category>
      <category> suing mcdonalds</category>
      <dc:creator>doug landau</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>